A good. The relationship anywhere between recombination frequency and you may genetic distance from inside the eukaryotes

Jevons, M. P., and you may Parker, M. T. (1964). J. din. Street., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. M. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Alive, I., and you may Nichols, Good. C. (1961).J. shoot. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, Good. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, M. (1960). Jap. J. wet. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you can Williams, R. E. 0. (1958). step 3. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Yards., Plotkin, S. Good., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. Roentgen., and you will Pidcoe, V. (1960). Science, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Yards. T. (1966). From inside the “The fresh Medical Basis of Medicine Yearly Review” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. School regarding London, This new Athlone Push, London area. Parker, M. T., Todinson, A good. J. H., and you will Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.

The brand new parasexual years as well as use in hereditary research

Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C a beneficial d . , 66,605. Poole, P. M., and you will Baker, J. Roentgen. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., twenty five, 116-123. Statement (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,9, 115-118. Statement (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., thirteen, 119-122. Declaration (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Report (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Yards. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. Meters., and you will Asheshov, Age. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., twenty-six, 111-122. Rountree, P. Meters., and you may Freeman, B. M. (1955). Med. J. Aust., 2, 157-161. Ruys, An excellent. C., and you can Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you may Wilson, J. B. (1958). Was.step 3. damp. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C you d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Path. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Roadway. Buc

Tarr, H. A. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. A. (1965). Vet. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. R., and you may Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.

Williams, R. E. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., We . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., and you will Jevons, M. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, R. E. O., and you will Rippon, J. Elizabeth. (1952). J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320-353. Williams, R. Elizabeth. O., Rippon, J. Elizabeth., and you will Dowsett, L. Meters. (1953). Lancet, we, 510-514. Wilson, Grams. S., and you will Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, we, 647-649.

Genetic Research in Small-bacteria DAVID A beneficial. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, England I. Inclusion . 11. Segregation as Evidence of Simple Genetic Manage . An effective. New hereditary way of biology . B. The new identification away from segregation . 111. The cornerstone out-of Genetic Mapping . B. The new sequencing https://datingranking.net/escort-directory/antioch/ away from loci towards the a good linkage chart: multi-factor crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Hereditary fine-framework . E. Deletion mapping . IV. Practical Hereditary Tests . A. Dominance evaluation . Bplementation testing . C. Epistasis . V. Hereditary Data within the Eukaryotic Microorganisms . A. General factors . step one. 2. Tetrad research . B. Genetic studies particularly organisms 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . dos. Aspergillus niger and other “imperfect” fungi step 3. Neurospora crassa . cuatro. Other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . six. Filamentous basidiomycetes . seven. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Hereditary Studies in Prokaryotes . A good. General considerations . 1. Fertility types and you will conjugational mapping . dos. Transduction and you can co-transduction . step 3. Sales and you may co-transformation cuatro. Non-choosy analysis .

50 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94

Watson, W

Hereditary study particularly organisms step one. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or any other Enteric micro-organisms . 2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you may Ps. putida . step three. Bacillus subtilis 4. Streptmyces coelicolor and other actinomycetes . 5. Almost every other germs C. Formal mapping methods independent away from recombination VII. Genetic Data during the Viruses An excellent. Standard factors . step 1. Types of widespread genomes 2. Special features of trojan genetics B. Hereditary study particularly worms step one. Bacteriophages 2. Animal worms 3. Plant viruses VIII. Concluding Reviews Recommendations .